Site icon Lemon Law

Capital lease vs. Operating lease: The difference

Capital lease vs. Operating lease: The difference

An agreement that allows you to use a particular asset or equipment for a certain period. These agreements can be of several types, mainly operating lease and capital lease; both have their own attributes and differences.

We have made a comprehensive guide for you about both:

Understanding The Capital Lease

A capital lease is a long-term, noncancellable agreement where, lesser that is, the owner of the equipment transfers the ownership to the buyer on lease for a certain period. These agreements are mainly prepared when a buyer has no liquidity or money to purchase the equipment. Therefore, they either choose to borrow or lease assets. Here equipment serves as an asset. However, this type of equipment lease can be considered debt since ownership of assets is passed only after completion of the lease period. For example, several companies obtain assets such as lands, buildings, aircraft, ships or heavy machinery, earth moving equipment, etc., on equipment lease. Although a capital lease is a rental agreement, it is written as an asset-based on certain criteria under GAAP standards. Capital leases impact on a company’s assets, liabilities, depreciation expense, influencing interest expense.

A Lease Contract Must Have The Following Conditions To Term As A Capital Lease:

Pros Of Capital Lease

Cons Of Capital Lease

Understanding The Operating Lease

Operating leases, in simple words, can be described as an agreement between the owner of asset or equipment and the user, where the owner allows the use of equipment for a certain period without transferring the ownership rights.

Pros Of Operating Lease

Cons Of Operating Lease

Capital Lease Vs Operating Lease

A capital lease, also described as a finance lease, is considered an asset in the company’s balance sheet, while on the other hand, operating leases are evaluated as an expense, so it’s off the balance sheet. A capital lease is more of buying or owning a piece of property; in contrast operating lease is evaluated as renting out a property. Significant capital lease vs operating lease can be seen in their accounting treatment, respectively.

Operating leasing of assets is used for the short term and is similar to renting a property. There is no involvement in transferring ownership between one party called the lessor and the buyer called the lessee. However, periodic lease payments are expensed in the income statement and managed as operating expenses, thus impacting both net income and operating expenses. In contrast, the capital lease is more like owning property and used for long-term equipment leasing.

Accounting Treatment Of Capital Lease And Operating Lease

For an operating lease, the accounting treatment is simple and clear to understand. As mentioned, periodic equipment leasing payments are considered operating expenses and added as expenses in the income statement. Hence, they are not used on the balance sheet, and the company cannot charge depreciation on operating leases assets.

On the other hand, a capital lease is managed as debt or loan due to the transfer of ownership between two parties. Thus, the interest payments of the capital lease are managed as an expense in the income statement. Unlike operating leases, their current market value is included on the balance sheet under the asset side, and the company has the right to charge depreciation of assets. Also, as it’s considered debt, the loan amount is included in the liability side of the balance sheet.

Generally, operating leases identify expenses little later than a capital lease.

Bottom line: Companies use both capital lease and operating lease depending upon their requirements. Considering their accounting treatments and tax influence on net income, companies often use either them or a combination of both. Capital lease and operating lease have their own set of pros and cons. Organizations weigh both options and decide which one they want.

Exit mobile version